A Science Coordination Team (SCT) Strategy Report
Fourth Draft
February 29,
2000
Introduction
The purpose of this
strategy report is to communicate to the Working Group the capabilities and
best use of the South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Science Coordination Team
(SCT). This is a product of self-examination conducted by the SCT during
January and February of 2000, following two years of existence (The SCT Charter
is dated, September 30, 1997). The
self-examination was prompted by a broadly held view among SCT members that the
team needs to better focus its activities.
Two key sentences in the
introductory paragraph of the 1997 Charter describe the broad role of the
SCT. “A Science Coordination Team (SCT)
is hereby established… to assist both the Working Group (WG) and Task Force
(TF)… by ensuring the highest level of communication, coordination, and
cooperation in the application of the various scientific disciplines to the
ecological and socioeconomic problems of south Florida.” “The SCT is responsible for… facilitating
the integration, synthesis, and application of the best scientific information
(including the Social Sciences) available for the South Florida Ecosystem Restoration
effort.”
The SCT
continues to consider these goals as conceptually appropriate. However, the SCT
has performed best when sufficient resources have been made available by member
agencies to ensure that specific tasks are fully addressed, and when both
management and the SCT have agreed that a task is of high priority (see
attached list of accomplishments). The
SCT recognizes that to become more effective in this role, these goals must be
narrowed and refined, given the limited availability of participating
scientists and funding.
The SCT
believes it can continue making essential contributions towards ensuring the
appropriate application of science to the south Florida restoration
effort. These
contributions can be made with existing levels of participation and support so
long as the SCT focuses on tasks that cannot be adequately covered by
individual agencies. At present, the
primary task of the SCT is to address important ecosystem restoration issues
that most warrant the attention and emphasis of the SCT (i.e., would benefit
from an independent/interdependent, multi-agency participation). Several different means are available to the
SCT for accomplishing this primary task.
These are:
·
Organization,
synthesis and peer review of existing information pertaining to specific scientific
issues.
·
Review
of technical manuscripts and documents.
·
Responding
to requests for assistance in clarifying or resolving the scientific aspects of
specific issues, or providing specific assistance (including support of
CROGEE).
·
Briefings
and information exchange that occur during and between SCT meetings.
To improve
the focus and efficiency of the SCT, at its January and February 2000 meetings,
the membership developed the following set of strategies and guidelines for
organizing and conducting its business:
Identification
of priority issues:
1.
Generate
a list of issues needing resolution or attention.
2.
Combine
overlapping or redundant issues.
3.
Prioritize
the issues.
4.
Decide
appropriate forum for addressing issue (e.g., scientific meeting, issue paper,
review of document, etc.).
5.
Estimate
resources and time required.
Task
approach to addressing issues:
1.
Identify
standing or ad hoc subgroups of SCT members to be responsible for each task.
2.
List all
steps needed to resolve/address issue. (Completed by the subgroup/team)
3.
Schedule
a realistic time frame for completing each task.
4.
Estimate
and secure resources needed for completing tasks.
5.
Work on
only those tasks for which proper resources are assigned.
Operating
Guidelines:
1.
Hold
meetings as needed, to allow more time for task teams to work. Use the centrally located Ft. Lauderdale
area as the primary meeting location, but also periodically move meeting and
conference/workshop locations around south Florida to better serve the needs of
the full SCT, the task teams, and the larger scientific community.
2.
Address
issues/tasks that originate from SCT members, the Working Group, Task Force,
and the scientific community.
3.
Communicate the results of task team projects
to the Working Group, Task Force, and the scientific community.
4.
Issue
a final report on the work of each task team.
5.
Provide
status reports on SCT activities to the Task Force and the Working Group by the
SCT co-chairs.
6.
Produce
an annual SCT report of accomplishments.
Resource
Needs:
Resources
to meet the goals of the SCT charter for the base level of operations described
above to be expanded to meet the wider goals of the charter requires dedicated
resources. The chair requires adequate
staff support for management of the coordination process. During the Science Sub-Group days, this
required one dedicated professional position and additional logistical support
[approximately 0.5 FTE and associated funding]. We suggest that the Task Force make the appointment of the SCT
Chair [for a 2-year term] with the Task Force member committing the needed
support for the position. In addition,
specific projects requested by the Task Force/Working Group [or any represented
TF/WG entity] need to have resources identified and dedicated to the task with
the availability of necessary resources to allow the SCT to accomplish the
goals specified in the task.