
What:
The South Florida Ecosystem Restoration and
Sustainability project consists of nearly 200 environmental restoration, growth
management, agricultural, and urban revitalization projects, programs, and initiatives
that are designed to make South Florida more sustainable in the future.
Goals
restore the natural hydrology of South Florida
enhance and recover native habitats and species
revitalize urban core areas to reduce the outward migration of suburbs and improve
the quality of life in core areas
Premises
on their current courses the natural and built
environments of South Florida are not sustainable
the environment, society, and economics of South Florida are not discrete systems
but are related interlinking subsystems that make up the South Florida ecosystem
Vision
a landscape whose health, integrity, and
beauty is restored and is nourished by its interrelationship with South Florida's human
communities
Who:
Participants in the restoration effort include
six federal departments (12 agencies)
seven agencies and commissions of the state of Florida
two American Indian tribes
16 counties and scores of municipal governments
representatives from major state industries commercial and private sectors
special interest groups
Restoration activities are generally guided and
coordinated by the South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task Force, its Florida-based
Working Group, various advisory boards (e.g., the Governor's Commission for a Sustainable
South Florida), and other technical working groups (e.g., the Science Coordination Team,
Public Outreach Steering and Support Team, and project coordination teams). These entities
interact and cooperate with one another through federal and state mandates, formal
agreements, treaty and trust responsibilities, ordinances, partnerships, and coalitions.
Where:
The ecosystem restoration project area extends from
the Chain of Lakes south of Orlando to the reefs surrounding historic Fort Jefferson
southwest of the Florida Keys. The area encompasses all the terrestrial and aquatic
habitats in this area. It also includes the metropolitan areas of Miami, Fort Lauderdale,
West Palm Beach, Fort Myers, and other growing communities in South Florida. As defined
the ecosystem covers approximately 10,800 square miles (28,000 square kilometers) and
includes 11 major physiographic provinces.
Why:
Water is the common lifeline for the natural and
built environments. Engineered flood control and water distribution systems, agriculture,
growth, and development have disrupted the region's water quality, quantity, timing, and
distribution (i.e., the hydropattern). Agricultural runoff and urban stormwater have
introduced high levels of phosphorus, mercury, and other contaminants into the water
system, polluting lakes, rivers, estuaries, and the Everglades. Abnormally high discharge
of stormwater into estuaries and coastal waters has severely degraded aquatic habitats
that support fish, birds, and other species. Groundwater is threatened by saltwater
intrusion and other marine-induced pollutants. These impacts have significantly stressed
the natural system. Evidence of these impacts include
50% reduction in the original acreage of the
Everglades
90%95% decrease in wading-bird populations
68 threatened or endangered species
2 million acre-feet of water lost from the system through discharge annually
1 million acres of the ecosystem under health advisories from mercury contamination
phosphorus contamination of Lake Okeechobee, the Everglades, and surrounding
wetlands
the rampant spread of invasive, exotic plants and the displacement of native
speciesRapid population increase, development, and urban sprawl along the state's coastal
areas have similarly stressed the built environment.
Agricultural areas in the interior face related
problems stemming from growth and urban sprawl. Indicators of stress in the built
environment include
16% reduction in agricultural lands
high numbers of sites contaminated by hazardous materials (brownfields)
greater unemployment, lower income and education levels, and a high prevalence of
poverty in urban cores
repetitive water shortages and salt water intrusion
increased demands for roads, utilities, and services in response to the outward
growth of suburbs
decreased tax bases in urban cores / overly stressed infrastructures
How:
Restoration efforts are guided by three linked
strategies.
Adaptive Management. Restoration participants
recognize that not all the data needed to restore the ecosystem is in hand. They also
recognize the need to move forward. Therefore, restoration efforts employ an overall
strategy that implements action where possible, while continuing to collect and refine
data. This iterative, feedback approach, termed adaptive management, relies heavily on
predictive modeling and support studies to identify management alternatives and evaluate
their potentials. It also employs extensive monitoring to assess the progress of
management actions and to provide feedback for refining both restoration actions and
predictive models. This approach provides the structure for initiating critical projects
immediately, the flexibility to modify activities when needed, and the coordination to
ensure accountability.
Innovative Management. The restoration effort further
recognizes that decisions must be based on sound science. Yet, science alone is not the
answer. Using systemwide management techniques that deal with issues holistically, are
outcome-oriented, and overcome institutional barriers are also important. Because the
ecosystem does not recognize governmental jurisdictions, successful restoration efforts
must also employ integrated governance to coordinate the activities of federal, state,
tribal, regional, and local governmental entities and to find ways to streamline
management and funding. Finally, broad-based partnership and public outreach are essential
for building a consensus on needed actions and for maintaining good lines of communication
with the public and among restoration partners.
Action. Critical projects are underway to restore the
regional hydropattern, recover endangered species and habitats, and revitalize urban cores
and manage growth. Projects like the Kissimmee River Restoration Project, Everglades
Construction Program, and the Water Preserve Areas Project demonstrate that more natural
hydropatterns can be reestablished. The Multi-Species Recovery Project underscores the
need to address issues holistically and on a regionwide basis. The innovative Eastward Ho!
Initiative shows how public, private, and governmental entities can work together to
breathe new life into urban areas and foster more sustainable lifestyles. Finally, the
South Dade Land Use / Water Management Planning Project and the Florida Keys Carrying
Capacity Study provide excellent examples for a more sustainable future. These ambitious
projects show that a sustainable South Florida can become a reality.
When:
Now, and the next 50 years. Reestablishing a healthy
and sustainable ecosystem, including both the natural and built environments, is a massive
undertaking that will take decades to complete and will require long-term funding
commitments. The progress made to date shows that the current methods work and will
continue to be improved. Ultimate success will depend on continued consensus and
cooperation among restoration partners, shared responsibilities, and consistent funding.
Restoring the South Florida ecosystem will secure the future of South Florida and will
provide valuable examples of restoration methods and strategies that can be applied
elsewhere. |
|