3.4 CENTRAL EVERGLADES

Sub-Region 3

Central Everglades

Project ID No. PPM Lead Organization Start Finish Financial Requirement Appropriated to Date Page

WCA-2A Regulation Schedule Review

CE01

Brooks-Hall

USACE

1998

2001

500,000

0

155

Water Conservation Areas: Inholdings, Mineral Rights, and Other Interests

CE02

Rinaldi

SFWMD

1948

2010

18,028,792

9,228,792

156

Soil Survey for Everglades National Park& Water Conservation Areas

CE05

Hendricks

NRCS

1997

2002

4,280,000

0

157

Canal C-111 Project

CE06

Landers

USACE

1994

2005

154,917,000

101,937,000

158

East Cape and Homestead Canal Plugs Repair

CE07

Ring

USACE

1997

1997

374,000

235,000

160

Everglades National Park Water & Wastewater

CE08

Ring

NPS

1997

TBD

38,491,000

3,748,000

161

Hole-in-the-Donut

CE09

Norland

NPS

1994

2017

75,000,000

6,284,584

162

Modified Water Deliveries to Everglades National Park

CE10

Ring

ENP

1990

2006

131,500,000

43,774,000

163

Additional Lands - 8.5 Square Mile Area

CE11

Outland

FDEP

1998

END

76,000,000

0

164

East Everglades Addition to Everglades National Park

CE12

Ring

NPS

1997

2000

106,060,000

61,150,000

165

Experimental Program of Modified Water Deliveries to ENP

CE13

Landers

USACE

1985

2006

0

0

166

Nutrient Threshold/dosing

CE15

Fontaine

SFWMD

1994

2001

13,000,000

10,000,000

167

South Dade Wetlands

CE17

Rinaldi

SFWMD

1994

2007

40,000,000

26,250,000

168

Six Water Level Meteorological Stations

CE18

Harrell

FDEP

1998

2003

1,349,500

0

169

C-111 Basin Hydrologic Investigations and Model Department

CE19

Graham Generaux

UF/FIU

1998

2001

2,040,600

0

170

Restoration of pineland and hardwood hammocks on previously rock plowed land in C-111 Basin in Dade County

CE21

Pybas

IFAS

1997

2001

1,200,000

0

171

Extension/Public Information to Support Ecosystem Restoration in C-111 Basin

CE23

Pybas

UF/IFAS

1997

2001

1,508,850

0

172

Grossman Hammock Restoration

CE24

DeVries

ENP

1998

2000

100,000

100,000

173

West Dade Wastewater Reuse Study

CE25

Landers

USACE

1997

1999

100,000

100,000

174

Exotic Plant Control and Restoration of Degraded Plant Communities

CE26

Anderson

GFWFC

1998

1998

424,000

475,000

175

Tree island Restoration Everglades Mgt Area

CE27

Anderson

GFWFC

1997

2003

253,000

108,000

176

Everglades Landscape and Everglades Water Quality Model Development

CE29

Fontaine

SFWMD

1994

2001

3,500,000

2,400,000

177

Everglades Tree Island Research and Monitoring Initiative: Phase 1

CE30

Sklar, Heisler

SFWMD

1997

1999

169,751

83,900

178

Inventory of Tree Islands in WCAs 2 and 3

CE31

Heisler

FGFWFC

1997

2002

512,800

171,400

179

Phosphorous Monitoring at Loxahatchee NWR

CE34

Musaus

USFWS

1992

END

13,000

78,000

180

Exotic Plant Control on Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge

CE35

Musaus

USFWS

1992

end

205,000

817,500

181

Miccosukee Tribe Water Management Area

CE36

Duncan

Miccosukee

1997

2002

42,113,000

0

182

Miccosukee Tribe Water Management

CE37

Duncan

Miccosukee

1997

ongoing

25,200,000

199,000

183

Subregional characterization of the geological framework of the subsurface coarse sand zone and its influence on Florida Bay and the southern Florida ecosystem

CE38

Scott

FDEP

1999

2001

300,000

0

184

Florida Bay Fisheries - Habitat Assessment Program

CE40

Robblee

FLDEP

1997

2000

480,000

218,000

185

Relationships between Inshore Populations of the Pink Shrimp, Penaeus duorarum, and Offshore Tortugas and Sanibel Fisheries

CE41

Robblee

USGS/BRD

1997

1999

150,000

75,000

186

Florida Bay Program Support

CE42

Robblee

USGS/BRD

1997

2001

270,000

108,000

187

Temporal and Spatial Variation in the Seagrass Associated Fish and Invertebrates in Johnson Key Basin, western Florida Bay

CE43

Robblee

USGS/BRD

1997

2001

450,000

150,000

188

High Resolution Bathymetry of Florida Bay

CE44

Robblee

USGS/BRD

1997

1999

549,000

366,000

189

Wading Bird Empirical Studies

CE45

DeAngelis

USGS/BRD

1997

2000

205,000

95,000

190

Fish recruitment, Growth and Habitat Use in Florida; An Integrated Team Approach

CE46

Robblee

USGS/BRD

1997

1998

825,000

275,000

191

Population genetic structure and the dispersal of freshwater fishes and prawns

CE47

Loftus

USGS/BRD

1996

2000

130,000

10,000

192

Freshwater mesocosm Studies

CE48

Loftus

USGS/BRD

1996

2002

187,000

82,000

193

Role of Aquatic Refuges in the ecology of wetland fishes

CE49

Loftus

USGS/BRD

1998

2001

150,000

0

194

Life History and Ecology of the Everglades Crawfish

CE50

Loftus

USGS/BRD

1996

2000

250,000

85,000

195

An Individual-Based Spatially -Explicit Model of the Cape Sable Seaside Sparrow Population in Florida Everglades

CE51

DeAngelis

USGS/BRD

 

1998

117,000

117,000

196

Critical Model Development for the Restudy

CE52

DeAngelis

USGS/BRD

1998

206,000

103,000

197

Public Lands Information Center

CE53

Ring

NPS

2000

2009

1,800,000

0

198

Development of trophic models for amphibians and reptiles in South Florida

CE54

DeAngelis

USGS

1997

1998

100,000

50,000

199

Computer simulation modeling of intermediate trophic models for ATLSS of the Everglades/ Big Cypress region

CE55

DeAngelis

USGS

1997

1999

87,907

179,000

200

Development of selected model components of an ATLSS for the wetland ecosystems of South Florida

CE56

DeAngelis

USGS

1997

2000

406,930

983,000

201

Network analysis of trophic dynamics in South Florida Ecosystems

CE57

DeAngelis

USGS

1997

1999

200,000

200,000

202

Experimental Studies of Population Growth and Predator-Prey Interactions of fishes in the Everglades National Park

CE58

Loftus

USGS

 

2001

75,100

0

203

Population Structure and Spatial Delineation of Aquatic Consumer Communities in the Everglades National Park

CE59

Loftus

USGS

 

2001

204,100

99,100,000

204

Vegetation Dynamics of Land-Margin Ecosystems: Mangroves of South Florida

CE60

Smith

USGS

 

250,700

0

205

Hydrologic Variation and Ecological Processes in the Mangrove Forest of South Florida

CE61

Smith

USGS

 

1999

100,880

0

206

Subtotal for Central Everglades:

         

744,334,910

369,336,176

 

ECOLOGICAL SETTING

The Central Everglades Sub-region consists of the Water Conservation Areas (WCA’s), A.R.M. Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge, Everglades National Park (including Florida Bay to the park boundary), western portions of the C-102 and C-103 basins, the C-113 basin, the Southern Glades, and Model Lands.

The WCA’s encompass 1,350 square miles and represent an area equivalent to about one-third of the historic Everglades landscape. This area has been protected from development but greatly modified by channelization and diking. The WCA’s are five interconnected, diked impoundments situated downslope (south) of Lake Okeechobee and immediately upslope (north) of Everglades National Park (ENP). WCA No. 1 is entirely within Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge (LNWR). The WCA’s are wedged between the developed Atlantic Coastal Ridge (Lower East Coast, LEC), the Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA) and Big Cypress National Preserve.

The WCA’s provide many functions. In addition to providing water to most of the remaining Everglades habitat, they also provide water control functions including water storage, water supply, and flood control. The levee system to the east prevents flood waters from inundating the principally urban LEC, while the canals provide water supply for the agricultural lands and ENP. The WCA’s enhance water supply to the LEC by recharging the Biscayne Aquifer, the primary drinking water source for the urban area, and by retarding saltwater intrusion.

All of these functions are to be accomplished in a manner beneficial to the abundant wildlife resources dependent on the system. The WCA’s contain the last remnants of the tall-sawgrass landscape, as well as the bulk of deep marshes, wet prairies, and tree island hammocks still remaining outside ENP. The WCA’s are critically important to a diverse array of wildlife resources, particularly wading birds (including the endangered wood stork), the American alligator, and the endangered snail kite. Grass shrimp, crayfish, and select fish species are well adapted to the periodic wet/dry regimens that characterize the Everglades.

LNWR preserves the largest and most pristine remaining section of the northern Everglades. It is designated as critical habitat for snail kites and as an Outstanding Florida Waters. Thousands of tree islands, sloughs, wet prairies, and sawgrass plains characterize LNWR. It contains some of the deepest peat layers left in the Everglades. LNWR is surrounded by urbanization to the east and agriculture to the west.

The non-marine southern Everglades portion of the sub-region is coincident with the freshwater and terrestrial portions of Everglades National Park (ENP) and the adjacent authorized East Everglades acquisition lands. Established in 1947, this is the first national park created to protect a threatened ecological system. It is a wetland of international importance and has been named an International Biosphere Reserve and a World Heritage Site.

The mainland portion of ENP, predominately a mosaic of flat, seasonally flooded marshes and prairies with interspersed forested islands, is dependent on alternating wet and dry seasons. It has a high biotic diversity with a unique mixture of temperate and tropical species. This includes a large number of endangered animal species and of endemic plant species with highly specific habitat requirements.

The sub-region also includes the agricultural area east of C-111 in southern Dade County that drains into C-111 from the C-102 canal west of S-194, the C-113 canal, the C-103 canal west of S-196, and the C-111E canal. This area is utilized for production of a wide variety of vegetables and tropical fruits.

The sub-region includes the portion of Florida Bay within the ENP boundaries. Florida Bay is an 850-square-mile mosaic of shallow-water banks and relatively deeper basins connected by deep narrow channels. It is dotted with hundreds of small islands or "keys" rimmed with mangroves. Until recently clear waters and lush seagrass meadows characterized the Bay.

Florida Bay is the principal inshore nursery for the offshore Tortugas pink shrimp fishery. It provides critical nursery habitat for other important recreational and commercial fishery species, such as spiny lobster, red drum, and spotted seatrout. The Bay also supports numerous protected species, including bottle nosed dolphin, sea turtles, manatees, and American crocodile. About 85 percent of Florida Bay lies within Everglades National Park; while the remainder lies within the FKNMS.

The Southern Glades and Model Lands consist of a broad southern coast marsh prairie, with a relatively narrow fringing belt along the coastline of mangrove swamps. Under natural conditions, the southern coast marsh prairie occurred in a relatively limited area in Florida, inland from the coast in an area from east of Homestead to an area between Long Pine Key and the broadening belt of mangrove swamps north of Cuthbert and West Lakes. These prairies were separated from Shark Slough and its flanking southern Everglades marsh prairies by the Miami Rockland pine ridge.

LINKAGE TO THE TOTAL SYSTEM

The WCA’s are integral to the restoration effort. They include the largest remaining area of undeveloped Everglades. LNRW is currently managed in a manner that emphasizes preservation of the natural habitat in order to promote wetland species health and biodiversity. The WCA’s also serve as storage areas for excess water from Lake Okeechobee and the EAA, thus providing flood control for the LEC urban area. Water stored in the WCA’s augments the LEC water supply by recharging the Biscayne Aquifer and retarding saltwater intrusion. Management of the WCA’s also controls water flow into ENP.

Water from the mainland portion of ENP flows south to provide fresh water to the Park's mangrove fringe and Florida Bay. ENP, in turn, is directly dependent on Lake Okeechobee and the Water Conservation Areas for fresh water and is subject to contaminants transported from these areas. Because it is situated so close to a major metropolitan area, ENP faces serious threats. The water that supports Everglades resources is also in demand by urban residents and the agriculture industry. These demands for water and flood control are the source of many of the present problems in ENP.

Agricultural areas within the C-111 basin drain primarily either into Taylor Slough via the L-31W canal and pump station S-332 or to the panhandle of ENP via the lower C-111. Since these areas were historically within the Taylor Slough basin, the runoff volume is important to the area’s slough hydrology. Under some conditions, flows also are discharged eastward to Biscayne Bay. These waters aid in maintaining a freshwater head which prevents salt water intrusion.

The water of Florida Bay is a mixture of freshwater runoff from the Everglades and water from the Gulf Coast that is transported around Cape Sable from the West Florida Shelf. Periodically, the reef tract is inundated by water from Florida Bay that escapes seaward through these same channels.

Inland areas of South Florida are the source of fresh water to the coastal areas. Florida Bay and South Biscayne Bay are the receiving waters for discharges from several water management canals. These serve as direct links to upstream areas and are a source of nutrient and contaminant contributions from urban and agricultural areas. Also, Dade County ground water is the primary source of drinking water for the Florida Keys; thus, wellfield contamination problems have a direct impact.

The Southern Glades and Model Lands areas receive a dominant portion of their inflows from direct rainfall. The Southern Glades area provides sheetflow across the lower C-111 and into the ENP panhandle area. The Model Lands area provides sheetflow to the lower Biscayne Bay.

ECOSYSTEM PROBLEMS AND RESTORATION OBJECTIVES

Both water quality and quantity in the WCA’s have been severely impacted as a result of their location between urban and agricultural development, and the water management operations of the C&SF Project. In particular, LNWR receives the highest average annual phosphorus loadings of all other WCA’s as well as ENP. LNWR also receives higher amounts of some pesticides, the effects of which are unknown.

Since a major portion of the Kissimmee/Okeechobee and Atlantic Coastal Ridge drainage is diverted to sea for regulatory flood control, historic hydrologic flow through the WCA’s is severely reduced. The areas have been virtually isolated from the Kissimmee and Okeechobee watersheds, and the sheetflow that was a critical element in the formation and ecological structure and function of the Everglades landscape has been eliminated.

There have been major hydroperiod impacts resulting from impoundment of these areas. Channelization coupled with impoundment has increased depth and hydroperiods at the southern end of the systems, while dewatering and shortening hydroperiods in the northern end. One result is extensive invasion by exotic plants, such as melaleuca, as well as numerous exotic fish. Another is the shortening of hydroperiods and reduction in water coverage vital to successful wading bird reproduction. This is particularly critical since these units provide major rookery and foraging habitat for wading birds in normal and dry years. Because of the multiple Congressionally authorized functions that WCA No. 1 must satisfy, it is not possible to adopt a regulation schedule that is completely consistent with the purpose for which LNWR was established.

With drainage and development of the EAA, the WCA’s serve as retention/ detention systems for water storage and for input

of agricultural drainage. However, LNWR was established to mitigate the loss of Everglades lands to agriculture but has suffered, due to its location, as a support for agriculture. Chronic introduction of drainage waters with elevated concentrations of nutrients, especially phosphorus, has resulted in massive conversions of sawgrass and wet prairie communities to stands of cattails and cattail/sawgrass mixes.

In Everglades National Park, changes in the natural hydrologic cycle include water levels, surface-water inundation, and water flow. Completion of the Tamiami Trail in 1928, the first east-west road across the basin, altered and interrupted water patterns and blocked all natural sheetflow. Present flow patterns in ENP are limited and controlled by management of the WCA’s to the north, extensive agricultural and urban pumping, and drainage canals to urban areas to the north and east. Unnatural hydroperiods and hydropatterns throughout the Everglades are now typical, resulting in sharp reductions of seasonal water levels and large discharges for flood control purposes. These have been both ecologically significant and deleterious. Groundwater from the Biscayne Aquifer flows into Biscayne Bay modifying salinity and possibly carrying pollutants into the Bay waters.

The Everglades are presently subject to intense disruptions of historic geochemical processes due to human activities along its margins and, to some extent, from atmospheric transport. With the advent of intense land-use change, notably artificial drainage, cultivation within the Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA) and development of the Atlantic Coastal Ridge, phosphorus and other substances are delivered to the Everglades in quantities significantly above historic levels. One consequence of such enrichment is extensive development of cattail stands in phosphorus-enriched areas formerly dominated by sawgrass.

Changes in water quality, quantity, and distribution have had ramifications throughout the Everglades. The total number of wading birds nesting in the Big Cypress and Everglades basins has declined by more than 95 percent from peak estimates of nesting birds in the 1930s.

Understanding the relationships between a decline in wading birds and changes in hydropatterns that have resulted from water management practices will require increased study of (1) the dynamics of prey populations and (2) specific foraging strategies and patterns associated with successful nesting of wading birds. Some of the changes in aquatic communities that form the food base for wading birds are subtle and difficult to detect in the early stages until they are manifested in obvious collapses of native communities and natural processes. A good example is the recent finding of mercury at dangerous levels in fish and their predators.

Also, non-native fish have colonized natural and disturbed habitats during the past three decades. The rate at which fish have been introduced has increased since the mid-1970’s. Several introduced species of herpetofauna also occur in ENP, and colonization will likely continue.

Water management strategies have caused reduced reproductive effort, increased frequencies of nest flooding, and increased rates of juvenile mortality for the American alligator, one of the most ecologically significant of the larger vertebrates in the Everglades.

The continuing and possibly accelerating loss of species diversity of both flora and fauna from upland communities is of great concern. Invasion of the natural vegetation communities by exotic pest plants like the melaleuca and Brazilian pepper, is one of the most serious problems in ENP. Likewise, the extent of the melaleuca and Old World climbing fern in LNWR is a serious threat to the integrity of its wetland ecosystem. It is possible these and other invasive species may modify the water table and hasten extinction of native species.

Water levels required for flood protection in adjacent agricultural areas result in excessive seepage of water from the Everglades. This results in not only a loss of water from the natural system, but also significantly reduced water levels in the historic headwaters of Taylor Slough. Additionally, the seepage water into C&SF Project canals impacts the ability of the flood control system to prevent agricultural flood damages during wet conditions. Agriculture in this basin has experienced severe damages as a result of large storm events.

In Florida Bay a series of changes has become evident since 1987 that indicates acute ecosystem stress. These include:

  • Diminished water clarity;
  • Extensive die-off of seagrass habitat in western Florida Bay (no such loss has previously been observed in the Bay, nor reported in the literature);
  • Decline of mangroves on Bay islands;
  • Increased phytoplankton blooms;
  • Reduced populations in such species as pink shrimp, sponges, spiny lobster, and game-fish; and;
  • Increases in salinity (the Bay now exhibits high salinity, even hyper-salinity, throughout the year because of decreased freshwater inflow).

Vast areas of hardwood hammocks have already been lost to development. Remaining stands are highly fragmented, but are critical to dispersal and movement of the white-crowned pigeon and migratory birds, as well as for protection of many rare plants and animals.

Efforts are focused on redirecting freshwater and sheetflow into northern Florida Bay; however, there is concern that measures to direct more flow to the Everglades may bring new problems to Florida Bay. These may include an increased nutrient contribution, which could cause more algal blooms, and increased contaminant input to the ecosystem, especially pesticides.

In the Southern Glades and Model Lands area, drainage, agricultural practices, invasion by exotic plants, and excessive fires have degraded the ecosystem. Major changes include: the encroachment of mangrove vegetation into areas that formerly were marsh prairies, the conversion of expansive areas of marsh prairies into thickets of willow and other shrubs, and the introduction of exotics such as Casuarina, Melaleuca, Schinus, and others.

RESTORATION OBJECTIVES:

The restoration objectives of critical importance for the Central Everglades sub-region are listed below:

  • Reestablish historic pre-drainage hydrologic gradients, dynamic storage, and sheetflow.
  • Reestablish rainfall-driven hydrology.
  • Restore connectivity between WCA’s.
  • Restore pre-drainage water quality.
  • Restore pre-drainage landscape and ecological integrity.
  • Control exotic plants and animals.
  • Restore pre-drainage fire frequency and spatial boundary.

The restoration objectives for the non-marine portion of Everglades National Park are listed below:

  • Restore or maintain natural quantity, distribution, and timing of hydrologic flows and levels.
  • Restore or maintain water quality.
  • Restore or maintain natural vegetation and soil conditions.
  • Increase long-term natural productivity of fish and invertebrate communities.
  • Increase populations of top predators.
  • Reverse or arrest biodiversity declines in all landscapes, particularly uplands.
  • Satisfy water management needs on tribal lands consistent with other restoration objectives.

The restoration objectives for the south Dade agricultural area in the C-111 basin are listed below:

  • Maintain sustainable agriculture in south Dade County that is compatible with hydrologic restoration of the Everglades.
  • Reduce water management conflicts between the needs of agriculture and the needs of the natural system.
  • Prevent use of agricultural herbicides or pesticides that are harmful to the ecosystem.
  • Increase the use of Best Management Practices that prevent adverse impacts to the natural system.

The restoration objectives for Florida Bay are listed below:

  • Restore water budgets, circulation dynamics, and salinity.
  • Restore water quality and nutrient cycling.
  • Restore seagrass, mangrove, coral reef and other habitats.
  • Preserve upland biological communities.
  • Protect and restore endangered species populations.

The restoration objectives for the Southern Glades and Model Lands areas area listed below:

  • Restore or maintain natural quantity, distribution, and timing of hydrologic flows and levels.
  • Restore or maintain water quality.
  • Restore or maintain natural vegetation and soil conditions.
  • Increase long-term natural productivity of fish and invertebrate communities.
  • Increase populations of keystone predators.
  • Reverse or arrest biodiversity declines in all landscapes, particularly uplands.
  • Control fires to a frequency that is compatible with the health of the ecosystem.
  • Provide flows to Florida Bay and southern Biscayne Bay that enhance conditions in the estuarine environment.
  • Control the invasion of exotic plant species.

RESTORATION PROJECTS

Important restoration projects in progress or proposed for the Sub-region are identified on the following pages:

Adobe Acrobat Reader is needed to view these project sheets and can be downloaded here for free:
Acrobat.gif (898 bytes)

Remember the name of the folder you downloaded the Acrobat file to then navigate to that folder and double click
on the file in order to install it on your computer!!!  When using the Reader to view these sheets click on the show/hide
Navigation Pane button then on the bookmarks tab for convenient use.