|
3.4 CENTRAL EVERGLADES
Sub-Region 3
Central Everglades |
Project ID No. |
PPM |
Lead Organization |
Start |
Finish |
Financial Requirement |
Appropriated to Date |
Page |
WCA-2A
Regulation Schedule Review |
CE01 |
Brooks-Hall |
USACE |
1998 |
2001 |
500,000 |
0 |
155 |
Water
Conservation Areas: Inholdings, Mineral Rights, and Other Interests |
CE02 |
Rinaldi |
SFWMD |
1948 |
2010 |
18,028,792 |
9,228,792 |
156 |
Soil
Survey for Everglades National Park& Water Conservation Areas |
CE05 |
Hendricks |
NRCS |
1997 |
2002 |
4,280,000 |
0 |
157 |
Canal
C-111 Project |
CE06 |
Landers |
USACE |
1994 |
2005 |
154,917,000 |
101,937,000 |
158 |
East
Cape and Homestead Canal Plugs Repair |
CE07 |
Ring |
USACE |
1997 |
1997 |
374,000 |
235,000 |
160 |
Everglades
National Park Water & Wastewater |
CE08 |
Ring |
NPS |
1997 |
TBD |
38,491,000 |
3,748,000 |
161 |
Hole-in-the-Donut |
CE09 |
Norland |
NPS |
1994 |
2017 |
75,000,000 |
6,284,584 |
162 |
Modified
Water Deliveries to Everglades National Park |
CE10 |
Ring |
ENP |
1990 |
2006 |
131,500,000 |
43,774,000 |
163 |
Additional
Lands - 8.5 Square Mile Area |
CE11 |
Outland |
FDEP |
1998 |
END |
76,000,000 |
0 |
164 |
East
Everglades Addition to Everglades National Park |
CE12 |
Ring |
NPS |
1997 |
2000 |
106,060,000 |
61,150,000 |
165 |
Experimental
Program of Modified Water Deliveries to ENP |
CE13 |
Landers |
USACE |
1985 |
2006 |
0 |
0 |
166 |
Nutrient
Threshold/dosing |
CE15 |
Fontaine |
SFWMD |
1994 |
2001 |
13,000,000 |
10,000,000 |
167 |
South
Dade Wetlands |
CE17 |
Rinaldi |
SFWMD |
1994 |
2007 |
40,000,000 |
26,250,000 |
168 |
Six
Water Level Meteorological Stations |
CE18 |
Harrell |
FDEP |
1998 |
2003 |
1,349,500 |
0 |
169 |
C-111
Basin Hydrologic Investigations and Model Department |
CE19 |
Graham
Generaux |
UF/FIU |
1998 |
2001 |
2,040,600 |
0 |
170 |
Restoration
of pineland and hardwood hammocks on previously rock plowed land in C-111 Basin in Dade
County |
CE21 |
Pybas
|
IFAS |
1997 |
2001 |
1,200,000 |
0 |
171 |
Extension/Public
Information to Support Ecosystem Restoration in C-111 Basin |
CE23 |
Pybas |
UF/IFAS |
1997 |
2001 |
1,508,850 |
0 |
172 |
Grossman
Hammock Restoration |
CE24 |
DeVries |
ENP |
1998 |
2000 |
100,000 |
100,000 |
173 |
West
Dade Wastewater Reuse Study |
CE25 |
Landers |
USACE |
1997 |
1999 |
100,000 |
100,000 |
174 |
Exotic
Plant Control and Restoration of Degraded Plant Communities |
CE26 |
Anderson |
GFWFC |
1998 |
1998 |
424,000 |
475,000 |
175 |
Tree
island Restoration Everglades Mgt Area |
CE27 |
Anderson |
GFWFC |
1997 |
2003 |
253,000 |
108,000 |
176 |
Everglades
Landscape and Everglades Water Quality Model Development |
CE29 |
Fontaine |
SFWMD |
1994 |
2001 |
3,500,000 |
2,400,000 |
177 |
Everglades
Tree Island Research and Monitoring Initiative: Phase 1 |
CE30 |
Sklar,
Heisler |
SFWMD |
1997 |
1999 |
169,751 |
83,900 |
178 |
Inventory
of Tree Islands in WCAs 2 and 3 |
CE31 |
Heisler |
FGFWFC |
1997 |
2002 |
512,800 |
171,400 |
179 |
Phosphorous
Monitoring at Loxahatchee NWR |
CE34 |
Musaus |
USFWS |
1992 |
END |
13,000 |
78,000 |
180 |
Exotic
Plant Control on Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge |
CE35 |
Musaus |
USFWS |
1992 |
end |
205,000 |
817,500 |
181 |
Miccosukee
Tribe Water Management Area |
CE36 |
Duncan |
Miccosukee |
1997 |
2002 |
42,113,000 |
0 |
182 |
Miccosukee
Tribe Water Management |
CE37 |
Duncan |
Miccosukee |
1997 |
ongoing |
25,200,000 |
199,000 |
183 |
Subregional
characterization of the geological framework of the subsurface coarse sand zone and its
influence on Florida Bay and the southern Florida ecosystem |
CE38 |
Scott |
FDEP |
1999 |
2001 |
300,000 |
0 |
184 |
Florida
Bay Fisheries - Habitat Assessment Program |
CE40 |
Robblee |
FLDEP |
1997 |
2000 |
480,000 |
218,000 |
185 |
Relationships
between Inshore Populations of the Pink Shrimp, Penaeus duorarum, and Offshore Tortugas
and Sanibel Fisheries |
CE41 |
Robblee |
USGS/BRD |
1997 |
1999 |
150,000 |
75,000 |
186 |
Florida
Bay Program Support |
CE42 |
Robblee |
USGS/BRD |
1997 |
2001 |
270,000 |
108,000 |
187 |
Temporal
and Spatial Variation in the Seagrass Associated Fish and Invertebrates in Johnson Key
Basin, western Florida Bay |
CE43 |
Robblee |
USGS/BRD |
1997 |
2001 |
450,000 |
150,000 |
188 |
High
Resolution Bathymetry of Florida Bay |
CE44 |
Robblee |
USGS/BRD |
1997 |
1999 |
549,000 |
366,000 |
189 |
Wading
Bird Empirical Studies |
CE45 |
DeAngelis |
USGS/BRD |
1997 |
2000 |
205,000 |
95,000 |
190 |
Fish
recruitment, Growth and Habitat Use in Florida; An Integrated Team Approach |
CE46 |
Robblee |
USGS/BRD |
1997 |
1998 |
825,000 |
275,000 |
191 |
Population
genetic structure and the dispersal of freshwater fishes and prawns |
CE47 |
Loftus |
USGS/BRD |
1996 |
2000 |
130,000 |
10,000 |
192 |
Freshwater
mesocosm Studies |
CE48 |
Loftus |
USGS/BRD |
1996 |
2002 |
187,000 |
82,000 |
193 |
Role
of Aquatic Refuges in the ecology of wetland fishes |
CE49 |
Loftus |
USGS/BRD |
1998 |
2001 |
150,000 |
0 |
194 |
Life
History and Ecology of the Everglades Crawfish |
CE50 |
Loftus |
USGS/BRD |
1996 |
2000 |
250,000 |
85,000 |
195 |
An
Individual-Based Spatially -Explicit Model of the Cape Sable Seaside Sparrow Population in
Florida Everglades |
CE51 |
DeAngelis |
USGS/BRD |
|
1998 |
117,000 |
117,000 |
196 |
Critical
Model Development for the Restudy |
CE52 |
DeAngelis |
USGS/BRD |
|
1998 |
206,000 |
103,000 |
197 |
Public
Lands Information Center |
CE53 |
Ring |
NPS |
2000 |
2009 |
1,800,000 |
0 |
198 |
Development
of trophic models for amphibians and reptiles in South Florida |
CE54 |
DeAngelis |
USGS |
1997 |
1998 |
100,000 |
50,000 |
199 |
Computer
simulation modeling of intermediate trophic models for ATLSS of the Everglades/ Big
Cypress region |
CE55 |
DeAngelis |
USGS |
1997 |
1999 |
87,907 |
179,000 |
200 |
Development
of selected model components of an ATLSS for the wetland ecosystems of South Florida |
CE56 |
DeAngelis |
USGS |
1997 |
2000 |
406,930 |
983,000 |
201 |
Network
analysis of trophic dynamics in South Florida Ecosystems |
CE57 |
DeAngelis |
USGS |
1997 |
1999 |
200,000 |
200,000 |
202 |
Experimental
Studies of Population Growth and Predator-Prey Interactions of fishes in the Everglades
National Park |
CE58 |
Loftus |
USGS |
|
2001 |
75,100 |
0 |
203 |
Population
Structure and Spatial Delineation of Aquatic Consumer Communities in the Everglades
National Park |
CE59 |
Loftus |
USGS |
|
2001 |
204,100 |
99,100,000 |
204 |
Vegetation
Dynamics of Land-Margin Ecosystems: Mangroves of South Florida |
CE60 |
Smith |
USGS |
|
|
250,700 |
0 |
205 |
Hydrologic
Variation and Ecological Processes in the Mangrove Forest of South Florida |
CE61 |
Smith |
USGS |
|
1999 |
100,880 |
0 |
206 |
Subtotal for Central Everglades: |
|
|
|
|
|
744,334,910 |
369,336,176 |
|
ECOLOGICAL SETTING
The Central Everglades Sub-region consists of the Water Conservation
Areas (WCAs), A.R.M. Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge, Everglades National Park
(including Florida Bay to the park boundary), western portions of the C-102 and C-103
basins, the C-113 basin, the Southern Glades, and Model Lands.
The WCAs encompass 1,350 square miles and represent an area
equivalent to about one-third of the historic Everglades landscape. This area has been
protected from development but greatly modified by channelization and diking. The
WCAs are five interconnected, diked impoundments situated downslope (south) of Lake
Okeechobee and immediately upslope (north) of Everglades National Park (ENP). WCA No. 1 is
entirely within Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge (LNWR). The WCAs are wedged
between the developed Atlantic Coastal Ridge (Lower East Coast, LEC), the Everglades
Agricultural Area (EAA) and Big Cypress National Preserve.
The WCAs provide many functions. In addition to providing water
to most of the remaining Everglades habitat, they also provide water control functions
including water storage, water supply, and flood control. The levee system to the east
prevents flood waters from inundating the principally urban LEC, while the canals provide
water supply for the agricultural lands and ENP. The WCAs enhance water supply to
the LEC by recharging the Biscayne Aquifer, the primary drinking water source for the
urban area, and by retarding saltwater intrusion.
All of these functions are to be accomplished in a manner beneficial to
the abundant wildlife resources dependent on the system. The WCAs contain the last
remnants of the tall-sawgrass landscape, as well as the bulk of deep marshes, wet
prairies, and tree island hammocks still remaining outside ENP. The WCAs are
critically important to a diverse array of wildlife resources, particularly wading birds
(including the endangered wood stork), the American alligator, and the endangered snail
kite. Grass shrimp, crayfish, and select fish species are well adapted to the periodic
wet/dry regimens that characterize the Everglades.
LNWR preserves the largest and most pristine remaining section of the
northern Everglades. It is designated as critical habitat for snail kites and as an
Outstanding Florida Waters. Thousands of tree islands, sloughs, wet prairies, and sawgrass
plains characterize LNWR. It contains some of the deepest peat layers left in the
Everglades. LNWR is surrounded by urbanization to the east and agriculture to the west.
The non-marine southern Everglades portion of the sub-region is
coincident with the freshwater and terrestrial portions of Everglades National Park (ENP)
and the adjacent authorized East Everglades acquisition lands. Established in 1947, this
is the first national park created to protect a threatened ecological system. It is a
wetland of international importance and has been named an International Biosphere Reserve
and a World Heritage Site.
The mainland portion of ENP, predominately a mosaic of flat, seasonally
flooded marshes and prairies with interspersed forested islands, is dependent on
alternating wet and dry seasons. It has a high biotic diversity with a unique mixture of
temperate and tropical species. This includes a large number of endangered animal species
and of endemic plant species with highly specific habitat requirements.
The sub-region also includes the agricultural area east of C-111 in
southern Dade County that drains into C-111 from the C-102 canal west of S-194, the C-113
canal, the C-103 canal west of S-196, and the C-111E canal. This area is utilized for
production of a wide variety of vegetables and tropical fruits.
The sub-region includes the portion of Florida Bay within the ENP
boundaries. Florida Bay is an 850-square-mile mosaic of shallow-water banks and relatively
deeper basins connected by deep narrow channels. It is dotted with hundreds of small
islands or "keys" rimmed with mangroves. Until recently clear waters and lush
seagrass meadows characterized the Bay.
Florida Bay is the principal inshore nursery for the offshore Tortugas
pink shrimp fishery. It provides critical nursery habitat for other important recreational
and commercial fishery species, such as spiny lobster, red drum, and spotted seatrout. The
Bay also supports numerous protected species, including bottle nosed dolphin, sea turtles,
manatees, and American crocodile. About 85 percent of Florida Bay lies within Everglades
National Park; while the remainder lies within the FKNMS.
The Southern Glades and Model Lands consist of a broad southern coast
marsh prairie, with a relatively narrow fringing belt along the coastline of mangrove
swamps. Under natural conditions, the southern coast marsh prairie occurred in a
relatively limited area in Florida, inland from the coast in an area from east of
Homestead to an area between Long Pine Key and the broadening belt of mangrove swamps
north of Cuthbert and West Lakes. These prairies were separated from Shark Slough and its
flanking southern Everglades marsh prairies by the Miami Rockland pine ridge.
LINKAGE TO THE TOTAL SYSTEM
The WCAs are integral to the restoration effort. They include the
largest remaining area of undeveloped Everglades. LNRW is currently managed in a manner
that emphasizes preservation of the natural habitat in order to promote wetland species
health and biodiversity. The WCAs also serve as storage areas for excess water from
Lake Okeechobee and the EAA, thus providing flood control for the LEC urban area. Water
stored in the WCAs augments the LEC water supply by recharging the Biscayne Aquifer
and retarding saltwater intrusion. Management of the WCAs also controls water flow
into ENP.
Water from the mainland portion of ENP flows south to provide fresh
water to the Park's mangrove fringe and Florida Bay. ENP, in turn, is directly dependent
on Lake Okeechobee and the Water Conservation Areas for fresh water and is subject to
contaminants transported from these areas. Because it is situated so close to a major
metropolitan area, ENP faces serious threats. The water that supports Everglades resources
is also in demand by urban residents and the agriculture industry. These demands for water
and flood control are the source of many of the present problems in ENP.
Agricultural areas within the C-111 basin drain primarily either into
Taylor Slough via the L-31W canal and pump station S-332 or to the panhandle of ENP via
the lower C-111. Since these areas were historically within the Taylor Slough basin, the
runoff volume is important to the areas slough hydrology. Under some conditions,
flows also are discharged eastward to Biscayne Bay. These waters aid in maintaining a
freshwater head which prevents salt water intrusion.
The water of Florida Bay is a mixture of freshwater runoff from the
Everglades and water from the Gulf Coast that is transported around Cape Sable from the
West Florida Shelf. Periodically, the reef tract is inundated by water from Florida Bay
that escapes seaward through these same channels.
Inland areas of South Florida are the source of fresh water to the
coastal areas. Florida Bay and South Biscayne Bay are the receiving waters for discharges
from several water management canals. These serve as direct links to upstream areas and
are a source of nutrient and contaminant contributions from urban and agricultural areas.
Also, Dade County ground water is the primary source of drinking water for the Florida
Keys; thus, wellfield contamination problems have a direct impact.
The Southern Glades and Model Lands areas receive a dominant portion of
their inflows from direct rainfall. The Southern Glades area provides sheetflow across the
lower C-111 and into the ENP panhandle area. The Model Lands area provides sheetflow to
the lower Biscayne Bay.
ECOSYSTEM PROBLEMS AND RESTORATION OBJECTIVES
Both water quality and quantity in the WCAs have been severely
impacted as a result of their location between urban and agricultural development, and the
water management operations of the C&SF Project. In particular, LNWR receives the
highest average annual phosphorus loadings of all other WCAs as well as ENP. LNWR
also receives higher amounts of some pesticides, the effects of which are unknown.
Since a major portion of the Kissimmee/Okeechobee and Atlantic Coastal
Ridge drainage is diverted to sea for regulatory flood control, historic hydrologic flow
through the WCAs is severely reduced. The areas have been virtually isolated from
the Kissimmee and Okeechobee watersheds, and the sheetflow that was a critical element in
the formation and ecological structure and function of the Everglades landscape has been
eliminated.
There have been major hydroperiod impacts resulting from impoundment of
these areas. Channelization coupled with impoundment has increased depth and hydroperiods
at the southern end of the systems, while dewatering and shortening hydroperiods in the
northern end. One result is extensive invasion by exotic plants, such as melaleuca, as
well as numerous exotic fish. Another is the shortening of hydroperiods and reduction in
water coverage vital to successful wading bird reproduction. This is particularly critical
since these units provide major rookery and foraging habitat for wading birds in normal
and dry years. Because of the multiple Congressionally authorized functions that WCA No. 1
must satisfy, it is not possible to adopt a regulation schedule that is completely
consistent with the purpose for which LNWR was established.
With drainage and development of the EAA, the WCAs serve as
retention/ detention systems for water storage and for input
of agricultural drainage. However, LNWR was established to mitigate the
loss of Everglades lands to agriculture but has suffered, due to its location, as a
support for agriculture. Chronic introduction of drainage waters with elevated
concentrations of nutrients, especially phosphorus, has resulted in massive conversions of
sawgrass and wet prairie communities to stands of cattails and cattail/sawgrass mixes.
In Everglades National Park, changes in the natural hydrologic cycle
include water levels, surface-water inundation, and water flow. Completion of the Tamiami
Trail in 1928, the first east-west road across the basin, altered and interrupted water
patterns and blocked all natural sheetflow. Present flow patterns in ENP are limited and
controlled by management of the WCAs to the north, extensive agricultural and urban
pumping, and drainage canals to urban areas to the north and east. Unnatural hydroperiods
and hydropatterns throughout the Everglades are now typical, resulting in sharp reductions
of seasonal water levels and large discharges for flood control purposes. These have been
both ecologically significant and deleterious. Groundwater from the Biscayne Aquifer flows
into Biscayne Bay modifying salinity and possibly carrying pollutants into the Bay waters.
The Everglades are presently subject to intense disruptions of historic
geochemical processes due to human activities along its margins and, to some extent, from
atmospheric transport. With the advent of intense land-use change, notably artificial
drainage, cultivation within the Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA) and development of the
Atlantic Coastal Ridge, phosphorus and other substances are delivered to the Everglades in
quantities significantly above historic levels. One consequence of such enrichment is
extensive development of cattail stands in phosphorus-enriched areas formerly dominated by
sawgrass.
Changes in water quality, quantity, and distribution have had
ramifications throughout the Everglades. The total number of wading birds nesting in the
Big Cypress and Everglades basins has declined by more than 95 percent from peak estimates
of nesting birds in the 1930s.
Understanding the relationships between a decline in wading birds and
changes in hydropatterns that have resulted from water management practices will require
increased study of (1) the dynamics of prey populations and (2) specific foraging
strategies and patterns associated with successful nesting of wading birds. Some of the
changes in aquatic communities that form the food base for wading birds are subtle and
difficult to detect in the early stages until they are manifested in obvious collapses of
native communities and natural processes. A good example is the recent finding of mercury
at dangerous levels in fish and their predators.
Also, non-native fish have colonized natural and disturbed habitats
during the past three decades. The rate at which fish have been introduced has increased
since the mid-1970s. Several introduced species of herpetofauna also occur in ENP,
and colonization will likely continue.
Water management strategies have caused reduced reproductive effort,
increased frequencies of nest flooding, and increased rates of juvenile mortality for the
American alligator, one of the most ecologically significant of the larger vertebrates in
the Everglades.
The continuing and possibly accelerating loss of species diversity of
both flora and fauna from upland communities is of great concern. Invasion of the natural
vegetation communities by exotic pest plants like the melaleuca and Brazilian pepper, is
one of the most serious problems in ENP. Likewise, the extent of the melaleuca and Old
World climbing fern in LNWR is a serious threat to the integrity of its wetland ecosystem.
It is possible these and other invasive species may modify the water table and hasten
extinction of native species.
Water levels required for flood protection in adjacent agricultural
areas result in excessive seepage of water from the Everglades. This results in not only a
loss of water from the natural system, but also significantly reduced water levels in the
historic headwaters of Taylor Slough. Additionally, the seepage water into C&SF
Project canals impacts the ability of the flood control system to prevent agricultural
flood damages during wet conditions. Agriculture in this basin has experienced severe
damages as a result of large storm events.
In Florida Bay a series of changes has become evident since 1987 that
indicates acute ecosystem stress. These include:
Diminished water clarity;
Extensive die-off of seagrass habitat in western Florida Bay (no such loss has
previously been observed in the Bay, nor reported in the literature);
Decline of mangroves on Bay islands;
Increased phytoplankton blooms;
Reduced populations in such species as pink shrimp, sponges, spiny lobster, and
game-fish; and;
Increases in salinity (the Bay now exhibits high salinity, even hyper-salinity,
throughout the year because of decreased freshwater inflow).
Vast areas of hardwood hammocks have already been lost to development.
Remaining stands are highly fragmented, but are critical to dispersal and movement of the
white-crowned pigeon and migratory birds, as well as for protection of many rare plants
and animals.
Efforts are focused on redirecting freshwater and sheetflow into
northern Florida Bay; however, there is concern that measures to direct more flow to the
Everglades may bring new problems to Florida Bay. These may include an increased nutrient
contribution, which could cause more algal blooms, and increased contaminant input to the
ecosystem, especially pesticides.
In the Southern Glades and Model Lands area, drainage, agricultural
practices, invasion by exotic plants, and excessive fires have degraded the ecosystem.
Major changes include: the encroachment of mangrove vegetation into areas that formerly
were marsh prairies, the conversion of expansive areas of marsh prairies into thickets of
willow and other shrubs, and the introduction of exotics such as Casuarina, Melaleuca,
Schinus, and others.
RESTORATION OBJECTIVES:
The restoration objectives of critical importance for the Central
Everglades sub-region are listed below:
Reestablish historic pre-drainage hydrologic gradients, dynamic storage, and sheetflow.
Reestablish rainfall-driven hydrology.
Restore connectivity between WCAs.
Restore pre-drainage water quality.
Restore pre-drainage landscape and ecological integrity.
Control exotic plants and animals.
Restore pre-drainage fire frequency and spatial boundary.
The restoration objectives for the non-marine portion of Everglades
National Park are listed below:
Restore or maintain natural quantity, distribution,
and timing of hydrologic flows and levels.
Restore or maintain water quality.
Restore or maintain natural vegetation and soil conditions.
Increase long-term natural productivity of fish and invertebrate communities.
Increase populations of top predators.
Reverse or arrest biodiversity declines in all landscapes, particularly uplands.
Satisfy water management needs on tribal lands consistent with other restoration
objectives.
The restoration objectives for the
south Dade agricultural area in the C-111 basin are listed below:
Maintain sustainable agriculture in south Dade County
that is compatible with hydrologic restoration of the Everglades.
Reduce water management conflicts between the needs of agriculture and the needs of the
natural system.
Prevent use of agricultural herbicides or pesticides that are harmful to the ecosystem.
Increase the use of Best Management Practices that prevent adverse impacts to the
natural system.
The restoration objectives for
Florida Bay are listed below:
Restore water budgets, circulation dynamics, and
salinity.
Restore water quality and nutrient cycling.
Restore seagrass, mangrove, coral reef and other habitats.
Preserve upland biological communities.
Protect and restore endangered species populations.
The restoration objectives for the Southern Glades and Model Lands
areas area listed below:
Restore or maintain natural quantity, distribution,
and timing of hydrologic flows and levels.
Restore or maintain water quality.
Restore or maintain natural vegetation and soil conditions.
Increase long-term natural productivity of fish and invertebrate communities.
Increase populations of keystone predators.
Reverse or arrest biodiversity declines in all landscapes, particularly uplands.
Control fires to a frequency that is compatible with the health of the ecosystem.
Provide flows to Florida Bay and southern Biscayne Bay that enhance conditions in the
estuarine environment.
Control the invasion of exotic plant species.
RESTORATION PROJECTS
Important restoration projects in progress or proposed for the
Sub-region are identified on the following pages:
Adobe Acrobat Reader is needed to view these project
sheets and can be downloaded here for free:
Remember the name of the folder you downloaded the Acrobat file
to then navigate to that folder and double click
on the file in order to install it on your computer!!! When using the Reader to view
these sheets click on the show/hide
Navigation Pane button then on the bookmarks tab for convenient use.
|