3.6.4 U. S. Geological Survey (USGS) - $8,560,000
|
USGS budget matrix for fiscal year 2001 (FY1993-2000 included) |
|||||||||
|
(thousands of dollars) |
|||||||||
|
Function/Project
name |
1993 Actual |
1994 Actual |
1995 Actual |
1996 Actual |
1997 Actual |
1998 Actual |
1999 Actual |
2000 Actual |
2001 PB |
|
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT/ASSESSMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earth Science |
2,000 |
2,000 |
4,325 |
5,852 |
440 |
440 |
1,031 |
1,612 |
1,612 |
|
SCIENCE:
MONITORING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earth Science Monitoring |
0 |
0 |
777 |
2,290 |
1,000 |
1,000 |
584 |
515 |
515 |
|
SCIENCE:
RESEARCH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earth Science |
0 |
0 |
698 |
1,858 |
6,007 |
6,007 |
5,706 |
4,190 |
4,190 |
|
Biological Science |
0 |
654 |
1,154 |
654 |
1,154 |
1,154 |
1,281 |
2,243 |
2,243 |
|
Subtotal: USGS |
0 |
654 |
1,852 |
2,512 |
7,161 |
7,161 |
6,987 |
6,433 |
6,433 |
|
TOTALS |
2,000 |
2,654 |
6,954 |
10,654 |
8,601 |
8,601 |
8,602 |
8,560 |
8,560 |
The
U.S. Geological Survey is the nation’s primary provider of earth and biological
science information on natural hazards, the environment, water, minerals, and
energy resources. It is the Federal government’s principal civilian map-making
agency and the primary source of its data on the quality and quantity of the
nation’s water and biological resources. The maps, reports, and information
produced by the USGS help others meet their needs to manage, develop, protect,
and conserve America’s water, energy, mineral, land, and biological resources.
The USGS program of integrated science began
in 1995 and 1996 with major input from Federal and State agencies in Florida.
The USGS works through the South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task Force, its
associated work groups, and the Science Coordination team to ensure that its
science is relevant to the broad stakeholder community and to communicate
scientific information to managers and collaborators. Implementation of the
Restudy requires information on how the natural environment responds to
manipulation so that managers can ensure that their strategies are effective.
Scientists must provide monitoring programs and predictive models to meet these
needs, and USGS research scientists are working closely with State and Federal
partner agencies to develop and use these tools. For example, USGS ecosystem
and hydrologic models were used to evaluate the effects on species and habitats
of the Central and Southern Florida Project restudy alternatives under
consideration by the Corps of Engineers.
Periodic adjustment and refinement of plans and management schemes will
be necessary, but possible only if performance measures are defined, monitoring
tools are developed, a monitoring strategy is in place, and models are adequate
to guide future change.
Existing Program
The USGS program encompasses data,
ecological and hydrologic processes and models, information integration and
synthesis, and tools that make integrated science available to Federal and
State agencies and the public. USGS collects
data on hydrology, biology, geology, and other land characteristics. It uses
these data to describe the biological, geochemical, hydrologic, and ecological
processes that drive changes in the ecosystem.
The USGS program covers many of the identified science requirements for
the Everglades and Florida Bay. Much of the research on hydrologic,
cartographic, geologic, biological and ecological issues relevant to DOI's
research role in South Florida ecosystem restoration reflects a strong
collaborative program between the USGS and the NPS through DOI's Critical
Ecosystems Studies Initiative (CESI).
USGS scientists are integral in the research and critical to managing
the CESI program.
The USGS program is designed to enable
managers to predict the impacts of restoration actions. In addition to models,
predictive ability requires information on the characteristics of the original
system, the achievable targets and indicators of restoration, and the likely
biological responses of the system to each proposed restoration
alternative. Predictive capability
requires extensive understanding of the relations between and among the
biological, physical and chemical components of the ecosystem. Comprehensive
regional scale monitoring information is equally important to track for
restoration trends.
FY 2001 Program Thrusts
As the implementation phase of the restudy
proceeds, the USGS program in FY 2001 will expand in several areas. Regional Monitoring and research related to
implementation of the restudy will be augmented to address critical information
gaps relevant to key components of the Restudy’s Conceptual Ecosystem Models
and Performance Measures. Monitoring
and research conducted by the multiple federal, state, tribal and local
agencies will be coordinated through the CERP’s Adaptive Assessment Team,
coupled with coordination by the Science Coordination Team. USGS will become
more heavily involved in developing adaptive performance measures and new
evaluation tools. In partnership with
the US Army Corps of Engineers, USGS will provide information for evaluation
and implementation of Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) facilities. Hydrologic and ecological models will be
expanded to provide better predictive capabilities in critical geographic
locations such as Everglades National Park.
Information Management and Assessment
($1,612,000)
South Florida Information Access (SOFIA)
includes a comprehensive internet site (http://sofia.usgs.gov/), a database of
all USGS data relevant to South Florida restoration, and USGS activities
related to coordination and the South Florida Restoration Science Forum. The SOFIA site provides scientific
information and data in formats that are appropriate to managers and
scientists. The Internet site also
helps to keep the general public informed of the scientific rationale behind
the restoration. Real-time data on
surface water, groundwater, weather, and the sea surface are available on the
Internet so that managers and engineers can see the current hydrologic effects
of water projects and wildlife managers can keep tabs on habitat. In FY 2001, SOFIA will continue to expand
GIS capabilities in collaboration with the USGS GEODE Database. The SOFIA Internet site will sustain and
update topical presentations from the South Florida Restoration Science Forum.
Science:
Monitoring ($515,000)
USGS monitors water and/or associated
nutrients flowing into Florida Bay, Biscayne Bay, and the southwest coast, and
measures salinity within the Bay. These data are used in Florida Bay circulation
models and Everglades hydrologic models under development by the Corps, the
SFWMD, and the NPS. These models estimate salinity and other water quality
conditions resulting from various restoration scenarios. The Corps, NPS, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, and other resource managers need predictive models to determine
the location, circulation, and effects of nutrients and toxicants entering
Florida Bay, and to better understanding of relations between freshwater inflow
and Bay salinity. Temperature and salinity data collected in the Bay have been
compared with estimates from the recent past to help set restoration targets.
The USGS flow and nutrient measurements will help define present conditions as
a benchmark to document changes after restoration activities decrease
freshwater flows into the Bay.
Science: Research ($6,433,000)
l
Earth Science ($4,190,000)
The USGS is providing data, information and model components to
improve existing and planned models of water flow and water quality in the
Everglades and Florida Bay. Information collected for models of the Everglades,
and USGS model subcomponents include: aerial variation in evapotranspiration
(data and model), vegetative resistance to flow (data and model), ground-water
flow information, remote sensing interpretations, and an open channel and
wetlands flow model. USGS application
of advanced, classified remote sensing analysis will provide for the
extrapolation of data on vegetative roughness, enabling point data to be used
in aerially distributed models. The
USGS Southern Inland Coastal System (SICS) Model will be expanded to cover the
land area within Everglades National Park and renamed the Tides and Inflows
Model (TIME). The US Army Corps of Engineers used the results from the SICS
model and associated studies to develop their Florida Bay hydrodynamic model
that is used to predict the effect of Corps projects on Florida Bay.
Historic Conditions
The USGS is providing information about historic hydrological
conditions. Sedimentation rates, paleoecology and mineralogy determined from
shallow cores reveal the history of flooding and drought in the recent past and
are critical to the efforts of the Corps, ENP, and the SFWMD. This information
is used to evaluate how well models simulate historical conditions, and to
compare projected targets and variability to natural hydrologic variability of
the environments of South Florida.
Ecosystem history studies have revealed that seagrasses were not such a
dominant part of the bottom community in Florida Bay when Bays had lower
salinity. Studies at many of the
existing sites have been completed, and focus is turning to Shark Slough and
the tree islands. Tree islands are an
important rookery area that is critical nesting habitat for many neotropical
migratory birds, white ibis, little blue heron and other resident bird
populations. In addition, tree islands
serve as refuge habitat during high water. In areas where the
natural flow is compromised, tree islands have degraded, and valuable avian
habitat has been lost. Tree island
research will help managers understand how to reestablish this habitat.
USGS research on the sources, cycling and geochemistry of
nutrients, mercury, and related chemicals helps management agencies set
restoration and water quality targets, establish best management practices and
an operating schedule for nutrient removal facilities, and determine the best
strategies for reducing methylmercury in South Florida fisheries. The synthesis
of mercury and geochemistry will provide data and quantitative relationships
for the EPA model. The model will help
water managers predict the potential for management actions to exacerbate the
conversion of mercury to its most toxic and bioaccumulative [methyl
mercury] form.
Estuarine and Marine Earth Science Research
USGS is also changing the emphasis in
Florida Bay. In keeping with its shift
toward monitoring, the USGS is developing a monitoring index of bay
productivity, and a tool for using molluscs as an indicator of bay salinity.
Several existing projects on Florida Bay will be completed. will be
completed. For example, a project on
sediment production and transport within Florida Bay shows that much of the
internal transport and deposition is influenced by major coastal storms with
external input to Florida Bay, especially near the Everglades coast, being
primarily influenced surge events of freshwater inflow. In contrast, however, another USGS study
indicates that since external freshwater inflows from the Everglades coast has
been altered in recent history, that much of the Bay’s current biogeochemical
cycling has be internalized.
Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR)
The restudy identified the ASR as a critical component of
Everglades restoration. Additional storage will allow water managers to better
control water levels thereby providing regional environmental and water-supply
benefits for all of south Florida. When high rainfall events cause water levels
to rise, water can be injected into the aquifer for use at a later time when
the lake levels are low. In collaboration with the US Army Corps of Engineers,
USGS will provide information required to evaluate and implement ASR
technology.
l Biological
Science ($2,243,000)
Ecological Modeling -Refinement and Application
The cornerstone
of the ecological modeling effort is the Across Trophic Level System Simulation
(ATLSS), a series of linked models that permit prediction of the effects of
various restoration scenarios on biological resources of concern. ATLSS relies on landscape and hydrological
models, and links these to ecological models for producer and consumer
organisms, and populations of special emphasis, including wading birds,
crocodilians, Florida panthers, and other species with diminished populations. ATLSS has been used already in the
evaluation of proposed water management plans (the Corps of Engineers
“Restudy”) and will be used in the future to analyze the effectiveness of
restoration actions and to recommend modifications and improvements. As ATLSS components are developed for the
freshwater systems of the Everglades, emphasis will shift to extending them to
the southwest Florida/Big Cypress region, the mangrove zones, and coral reef
systems of the Florida Keys. (See also NPS, p 80).
Ecological Processes and Indicator Species
Selected species of animals and plant communities either have
special ecological roles in the South Florida landscape, or are sensitive
indicators of the overall condition of the environment. Research provides improved understanding of
the relationships among biological components of the South Florida ecosystem
and identifies those components that may be sensitive indicators of restoration
success. A growing base of knowledge on
these species and communities will ultimately permit incorporation into the
suite of ATLSS models. The Cape Sable
seaside sparrow, the wood stork, and the American crocodile are the focal
species. Information collected will
also accelerate recovery actions for the Florida grasshopper sparrow, Audubon’s
crested caracara, the lower keys marsh rabbit, and other threatened and
endangered plant and animal species.
Landscape Patterns, Processes, and Modeling
Free-living animal populations and the plant communities upon
which they depend are known to have been affected historically by a complex
mosaic of driving forces, including fires, floods, droughts, and hurricanes.
Acting across the landscape, these dynamic events affected living resources in
different ways. For example, some
populations were favored in wet years while others were favored in dry
years. Effects varied locally and
across broader portions of the landscape.
Understanding these temporal and spatial effects will be essential to
developing a long-term restoration program able to maintain a variety of
different living resources with different needs. Research will seek to link large-scale population dynamics of
living resources with management practices, including water delivery, fire,
etc. Field-verified remote-sensing
information is a valuable tool for developing the vegetation data for models.
The goal is to provide resource managers with models and tools to develop
optimal management prescriptions.
Florida Bay and the Great Coastal Ecosystems Complex
Florida Bay, the western mangrove/coastal system, Biscayne Bay,
and the Florida Keys are coastal and marine systems at the downstream end of
the South Florida drainage systems. The
distribution, amounts, and quality of freshwater entering these systems will
change as a result of restoration activities in more upland systems. These coastal areas are important for
fisheries and include the largest coral reef systems in North America. Studies now underway are documenting their
degraded pre-restoration conditions, and will provide information that will
ultimately be useful in predictive modeling under an expanded ATLSS program.
Contaminants and Biogeochemical Processes in Inland and Coastal
Systems
The greater Everglades system is contaminated from inputs of pesticides, potential endocrine disruptors, and most importantly by mercury, which arises from unknown sources. Research on the mobilization, storage, and transport of mercury in non-living components of the system has made important progress for understanding factors that influence mercury bioavailability. These studies have incorporated living resources. Studies on the effect(s) of contaminants on the well-being and persistence of populations, and ultimately on the success of the restoration as a whole are still needed.